A tale of two churches
I attended two church services
with a friend both were exclusive church groups by definition, one was based
around cultural and linguistic exclusivity and another on sexuality. While
these churches didn’t intentionally exclude they were nevertheless exclusive
through definition. The context these church groups were set up is based in
decades of exclusion from mainstream church. In a bid to avoid racism and
homophobia these churches have created safe spaces however they are not free from
biases.
In a church that is made up of
one ethnicity I am an anomaly. I am of mixed race and ethnicity, I find it hard
to define my ethnicity. Ethnocentrism and nationalism scare me, I know I can
very easily become the outsider in any group that defines itself on the basis
of these identities. I am also unmarried and childless, this often means
fending off questions about my marriage prospects, being introduced to men
against my will. Over the years I have found I am seen as less of a person and
even infantalised because of my lack of partner. The last service I attended
was particularly difficult as my singleness was spoken about like a disease,
the priest even went into a corner and spoke to another priest about my
advancing age and diminishing fertility. Given that my community is known for
forced marriages and other atrocities against women I was scared of being in
this church for a minute longer and left as fast as I could.
All I remember is walking out and
trembling at the bus stop, the incident has left me shaken. While I understand
the reason why these churches were set up was to avoid racism and to support
members of the BAME community I feel they have also become institutions of
cultural policing. To me these places thrive off the idea of their own cultural
and spiritual superiority as true followers of their faith. Claims of adhering
to the true faith and pure traditions have meant that these churches get away
with xenophobia and creating an oppressive spirituality.
In LGBT churches I find I am
often the target of socially sanctioned racism. The idea that sexuality is tied
to western civilisation and progress has meant that it is possible to speak
about non-white people as uncivilised in a socially acceptable manner. I was the only non-white person in a
white group, which spoke about barbaric black people and didn’t even
acknowledge my presence even once.
Trying to ignore the racism for
the sake of my friend who I was accompanying I sat through a service that I can
only describe as self-centred. Scripture and tradition were completely
deconstructed till the service resembled a self-help group. While I am critical
of tradition, I am particular about understanding Christianity and worship in
the context of the faith. My LGBT
brothers and sisters have been greatly abused as sinners however getting rid of
the concept of sin erases the purpose of Christ, it also creates a theology of
the self.
Both churches spoke about
possessing a truer and superior faith. This spiritual hierarchy does not sit
well with me, I find the idea of boasting about one’s faith hubris. Neither
church spoke about their faith, but about how they were better for believing
what they did.
The divide in the CoE over race
and sexuality is unpleasant, BAME Anglicans are assumed to be homophobic people
intent on being nasty in LGBT groups. LGBT Anglicans are assumed to be people trying
to destroy the church. Theological and spiritual literacy is not a luxury, it is
a necessity in our time.
PS: Silence, discomfort and discrimination brought about the formation of identity centric churches. We need to address pain and reconcile our differences. Please don’t use this post to denounce these churches.
PS: Silence, discomfort and discrimination brought about the formation of identity centric churches. We need to address pain and reconcile our differences. Please don’t use this post to denounce these churches.
Comments
Post a Comment